董依云,陶岚.Nd：YAP激光治疗干槽症的临床评价[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2021,30(1):23-27.
Nd：YAP激光治疗干槽症的临床评价
Clinical observation of Nd:YAP laser treatment of dry socket
投稿时间：2020-08-18  修订日期：2020-11-03
DOI：10.11752/j.kqcl.2021.01.05
中文关键词:  干槽症  Nd  YAP激光  疼痛  治疗次数
英文关键词:Dry socket  Nd  YAP Laser  Pain  Times of treatments
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
董依云 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔综合科, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海市口腔医学研究所, 上海 200011  
陶岚 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔综合科, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海市口腔医学研究所, 上海 200011 13917166195@139.com 
摘要点击次数: 593
全文下载次数: 569
中文摘要:
      目的 评价Nd：YAP激光治疗干槽症的临床疗效。方法 收集门急诊40例干槽症患者，随机分成观察组和对照组，彻底刮除坏死组织后，实验组采用Nd：YAP激光照射，对照组使用添加丁香油的碘仿纱条填塞，每3天治疗一次，比较2组治疗次数和每次治疗前疼痛评分，每次治疗前由同一位有经验的临床医师探查拔牙创愈合情况，检查局部是否有红肿触痛，拍摄数码照片，并根据肉芽组织覆盖率进行评分。结果 实验组治疗平均次数（1.5次）少于对照组的治疗平均次数（2.15次）（P<0.05）；实验组疼痛平均得分（3.70分）小于对照组的疼痛平均得分（4.00分）（P<0.05）。根据肉芽组织覆盖的评分，实验组得分（1.195分）优于对照组得分（1.067分），2组差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 经Nd：YAP激光局部照射的干槽症患者拔牙创愈合时间和疼痛缓解程度优于碘仿纱条塞治组，该研究为临床干槽症的治疗提供更加有效的方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective The aim of this study was to observe the clinical efficacy of Nd:YAP Laser in the treatment of dry socket. Methods 40 patients with dry socket were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. After the necrotic tissue was completely scraped, the experimental group was irradiated by Nd:YAP Laser, and the control group was stuffed with clove oil-added iodoform gauze, once every 3 days. The times of treatments and the pain score before each treatment were compared. Before each treatment, the same experienced clinician explored the healing of tooth extraction wound to analyze whether there was local swelling and tenderness, took digital photos, and scored according to the granulation tissue coverage rate. Results The average number of treatment in the experimental group (1.5) was less than that in the control group (2.15) (P<0.05), the average pain score in the experimental group (3.70) was less than that in the control group (4.00) (P<0.05). The average score based on the evaluation of doctor in the experimental group (1.195) was less than that in the control group (1.067) (P<0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups. The effect of the experimental group was better than that of the control group. Conclusion The healing time and pain relief degree of the patients with dry socket treated by Nd:YAP Laser were superior to the group treated by iodoform gauze, which provides a more effective treatment for dry socket.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭