| 潘悦萍,李婷婷.两种复合树脂与牙本质剪切粘接强度的比较[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2024,33(2):107-110. |
| 两种复合树脂与牙本质剪切粘接强度的比较 |
| Comparison of the shear bond strength for two kinds of composite resins against dentin |
| 投稿时间：2023-10-09 修订日期：2024-02-07 |
| DOI：10.11752/j.kqcl.2024.02.07 |
| 中文关键词: 剪切粘接强度 复合树脂 声波技术充填 |
| 英文关键词:Shear bond strength Composite resin Sonic filling technology |
| 基金项目:上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·上海交通大学口腔医学院研究型学科基金(编号:KQYJXK2020) |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 潘悦萍 | 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院牙体牙髓科, 上海交通大学口腔医学院, 国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海市口腔医学研究所, 上海 200011 | | | 李婷婷 | 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院牙体牙髓科, 上海交通大学口腔医学院, 国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海市口腔医学研究所, 上海 200011 | 150409616@qq.com |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 335 |
| 全文下载次数: 361 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 在离体牙牙本质上涂布粘接剂后分别予以声波技术充填 Sonicfill树脂及分层充填 P60树脂，评估应用两种复合树脂与牙本质的剪切粘接强度。方法 选择因牙周病拔除的磨牙 40颗，制成 40个牙本质试件，随机分为 2组。A 组为 Sonicfill树脂组，B 组为 P60树脂组。每组涂布粘接剂后，A 组采用声波技术充填树脂，B组采用分层技术充填树脂。经过循环温度为5 ℃及55 ℃的冷热循环疲劳试验，每个循环为3 min，共循环 500 次后，测试 2 组的剪切粘接强度（Shear Bond Strength,SBS）。结果 A 组的 SBS 为（10.32±1.13）MPa，B 组的 SBS 为（8.43±0.98）MPa，两者差别有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 运用声波技术的 Sonic‐fill树脂充填体相比采用分层充填的P60树脂拥有更高的剪切粘接强度。因此，在修复过程中使用声波充填技术不亚于传统分层充填树脂，且临床操作时间更短。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective After the adhesive was applied to the isolated teeth, the Sonicfill resin was filled with the sonic filling technique, and the P60 resin was filled with the layered filling technique respectively, and the shear adhesive strength of the two composite resins was evaluated to be applied to the dentin. Methods Forty molars extracted for periodontal disease were prepared, and 40 dentin specimens were made and randomly divided into two groups. Group A was the Sonicfill group and Group B was the P60 group. After each group was coated with a bonding agent and then filled with the resin, the shear bond strength (SBS) of the two groups was tested after cold and heat cycling, of which each cycle was 3 minutes at 5 ℃ and 55 ℃, for a total of 500 cycles. Result The difference between the SBS of group A (10.32±1.13 MPa) and group B (8.43±0.98 MPa) was statistically significant, and the SBS of group A was higher than that of group B (P<0.05). Conclusion Resin fillings with Sonicfill have a higher shear strength than those with P60 resin fillings. As a result, the use of Sonicfill during restorations results in improved bonding and shorter clinical handling times. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|